How Ukrainian Prosecutors Helped Trump Make Biden “Corrupt”
30 November, 2019
Former Prosecutors General of Ukraine - Yuriy Lutsenko (left) and Viktor Shokin Volodymyr Hontar / UNIAN; Oleksandr Synytsia / UNIAN

Two former prosecutors general of Ukraine, Viktor Shokin and his successor Yuriy Lutsenko, helped the team of U.S. President Donald Trump to make his opponent Joe Biden a "corrupt person". It happened within one of the largest international scandals in which Ukraine became involved — an investigation into the impeachment of the U.S. president.

The documents recently released by the U.S. Department of State make it easier to understand how exactly the Biden controversy appeared.

The lawsuit was filed by an American non-governmental organization American Oversight to verify the White House’s pressure on the leadership of Ukraine. On October 24, the court ordered the State Department to release the documents within 30 days.

Lost in Translation

Five of the 100 pages (pp. 66-72) are devoted to "Shokin / Lutsenko Records". It is, in fact, a retelling of two interviews that Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and his assistants conducted with both Ukrainian prosecutors general. It’s not clear who exactly made the notes of the meeting and handed them to the State Department.

Lutsenko started communicating with Giuliani in 2018. He hoped that with the help of Trump's lawyer he can get the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, with whom he had a conflict, fired. Shokin also sought to contact the Trump entourage. Fired in 2016 at Vice President Joe Biden's personal request, two years later he decided to tell his version of events. Lutsenko and Shokin convinced Trump's team that they have evidence of Biden's corruption.

Shokin talked with Giuliani via video call on January 23, 2019. Three Giuliani's assistants listened to the conversation — Lev Parnas, Igor Fruman and George Boyle. Parnas translated Shokin’s words, and the Ukrainian ex-PG also had a translator.

Shokin said that in 2015-16, when he was Prosecutor General, his subordinates were investigating five criminal proceedings against Mykola Zlochevsky, Minister of Ecology under President Viktor Yanukovych. Their essence was that Zlochevsky as a minister granted his own companies permits for the exploration and production of gas and oil. They were part of Burisma Holdings, Zlochevsky’s company incorporated in Cyprus.

After the Euromaidan, Zlochevsky left Ukraine for the United Kingdom. In the spring of 2014, Burisma's board included former Polish President Aleksander Kwaśniewski, Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden, Devon Archer, stepson of then U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, and former CIA associate Joseph Blade. According to Shokin, Zlochevsky hired them to protect his business.

READ MORE: Biden, Shokin, and Zlochevsky: How the Burisma Case Unfolded

It was in the spring of 2014, that the U.K. authorities arrested $23 million, which Zlochevsky withdrew from Ukraine. Shokin acknowledged that the Prosecutor General's Office had forwarded false documents to the U.K. that allowed Zlochevsky to "unfreeze" these funds, and stressed that this story had taken place before his appointment. As for his period in the Prosecutor General's Office, he testified that the investigations into the above five cases over Zlochevsky "stopped because of fear of the United States."

Shokin recalls his conversation in June or July 2015 with Geoffrey R. Pyatt, the then U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. "Pyatt told [Shokin] that this was a white-glove investigation, which, according to Mr. Shokin, implied it would be best to drop it," the document reads.

Shokin linked this conversation to Pyatt's speech in Odesa that September. According to Shokin, at the time, Pyatt accused the prosecutor of not investigating the case and called for Shokin to be dismissed. In fact, Pyatt did indeed criticize the work of the PGO at the time, but because of the inaction that allowed Zlochevsky to “unfreeze” $23 million in London, as well as his opposition to investigating the “diamond prosecutors” case. The diplomat did not mention the resignation of Shokin in that speech.

Hromadske asked Pyatt for a comment, but the diplomat had not responded by the time of publication.

Ексвіцепрезидент США Джо Байден (в центрі) та посол США в Україні Джеффрі Пайєтт (ліворуч) під час зустрічі з лідерами депутатських фракцій, Київ, 22 квітня 2014 року

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden (center) and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt (left) meet with MPs, Kyiv, April 22, 2014
Photo: Volodymyr Hontar / UNIAN

The alleged reason for Shokin's dismissal is explained in the "records" as follows: "President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko told Mr. Shokin not to investigate Burisma as it was not in the interest of Joe and/or Hunter Biden. Mr. Shokin was called into Mr. Poroshenko’s office and told that the investigation into Burisma and the composition of the board where Hunter Biden sat, has caused Joe Biden to hold up one billion dollars in U.S. aid to Ukraine." Shokin also testified that around April 2016, Poroshenko called him and said he would be discharged because of it.

There is no evidence of this to date. Instead, American diplomats who spoke in Congress in the framework of the investigation into the impeachment of President Trump testified: Biden himself demanded that the Burisma case be investigated, as well as that he demanded the dismissal of Shokin because he sabotaged U.S.-funded reform of the Prosecutor General's Office.

It was not just Biden and the U.S. Embassy, ​​but also E.U. embassies, that demanded the dismissal of the Prosecutor General. According to U.S. diplomats, Biden only voiced a decision that was agreed upon by U.S. diplomats and the U.S. State Department and that was supported by Europeans.

Hromadske reached out to Poroshenko's team for a comment, but we did not receive a response at the time of publication. Earlier, Kostiantyn Yeliseyev, Poroshenko's advisor on international affairs, said that in talks with Poroshenko, Biden had never mentioned either Burisma or his son.

"Believe me, the word "Burisma" or the name of Biden's son never came up. Including, once again, I emphasize during telephone calls and any contacts with Vice President Biden,” Yeliseyev said.

Hromadske was unable to contact Shokin, the editorial office is prepared to publish his position on the documents published if he wishes to do so.

П'ятий президент України Петро Порошенко (ліворуч) і ексгенпрокурор України Віктор Шокін (праворуч) під час засідання Верховної Ради, Київ, 10 лютого 2015 року

Fifth President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko (left) and ex-PG of Ukraine Viktor Shokin (right) during a parliamentary sitting, Kyiv, February 10, 2015. Photo: Mykhailo Palinchak / POOL / UNIAN

Lutsenko's Afterword

In a conversation with the Americans, Shokin emphasized that the cases in which Burisma appeared were closed by the Prosecutor General's Office in October 2016 under his successor, Lutsenko. Giuliani interviewed Lutsenko for two days — on January 25 and 26 in New York. The documents state that the former PG went to the meeting with Trump's lawyer, with Hlib Zahoriy — at that time MP from Petro Poroshenkos' Bloc, and Gunduz Mamedov (then-prosecutor in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, now deputy prosecutor general).

During talks with Giuliani, Lutsenko did not mention the pressure on him from Poroshenko or Biden on issues related to Burisma. Instead, he demonstrated a "document from Latvia" that stated that Burisma had paid millions of dollars to board members.

READ MORE: Oliver Bullough Talks Giuliani, Biden, and Burisma

In particular, $1.1 million were received by Kwaśniewski and $900,000 by Rosemont Fonseca, where Hunter Biden was a partner.

According to Lutsenko, the $900 000 invoice was for services rendered for lobbying by Joe Biden. The document does not specify how Lutsenko came to this conclusion — Hunter Biden never denied that he received money for work on the board of directors of Burisma, and stated that he never asked his father to protect the interests of its owner. Kwaśniewski told reporters that "truth be told, we never needed such assistance."

Subsequently, Lutsenko was interviewed by The Hill in March 2019, where he hinted that Biden had demanded Shokin's resignation over Burisma affairs. Shokin himself spoke of Biden's alleged corruption in a comment to The New York Times. That article was co-written by Iuliia Mendel, the current press secretary of Zelenskyy. This marked the beginning of a public campaign to discredit Biden and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, whose resignation was demanded by Lutsenko.

Three months later, in July 2019, Trump asked the new Ukrainian President Zelenskyy for a favor, namely to "investigate the Bidens", which eventually led to Congress initiating an impeachment inquiry against him.

READ MORE: Drugs, Lobbying and Family Tragedies: What Is Known About Joe Biden's Son

Hromadske has reached out to Lutsenko to ask if the person who recorded his conversation with Giuliani and his assistants had transcribed his words correctly. We also asked the former prosecutor general, what evidence he used to declare that by paying his son salary, Burisma, in fact, paid for Joe Biden's lobbying services. At the time of publication of this material, Lutsenko had not provided an answer. The editorial office is prepared to publish Lutsenko's response as soon as he gives it.

Генеральний прокурор України Юрій Луценко під час засідання Верховної Ради України, Київ, 24 травня 2017 року

Prosecutor General of Ukraine Yuriy Lutsenko attends a sitting of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv, May 24, 2017
Photo: Oleksandr Kosariev  / UNIAN

President Sytnyk: What State Department Documents Reveal

Among the documents released by the State Department are information about phone calls by the State Department Chief Mike Pompeo. As it turned out, he did speak with Giuliani. At a public impeachment hearing, U.S. Ambassador to the E.U. Gordon Sondland testified that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo knew about the so-called "shadow" U.S. policy on Ukraine — in particular, about the role of Trump's personal lawyer, Giuliani. He called it hardly "shadow", since the entire leadership of the State Department and the White House were aware of Giuliani's work.

The documents mention two phone calls — on March 26 and March 29. Curiously, Pompeo himself asked for a second phone call, as indicated by the subject of the email.

Before making the phone call, Giuliani’s assistant asked White House employee Madeleine Westerhout for Pompeo’s “work number” because the assistant was "unable to reach him through official channels."

A certain "Mr. Reshenko" was mentioned at the meetings between Lutsenko and Giuliani: most likely it refers to the former MP Sergii Leshchenko, who in May 2016 published part of the so-called “black ledger” of the Party of Regions. Trump’s then-campaign head Paul Manafort’s name was also mentioned, who would be forced to step down from office and later stand trial.

The documents say that Lutsenko mentioned the "black ledger" published by Leshchenko. Ex-PG stated that the MP and the then-U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Yovanovitch were close acquaintances. He claimed that Yovanovitch had requested him to close three proceedings, one of which was against Leshchenko.

According to the documents, Lutsenko also spoke about the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) of Ukraine: as if they were created under direct instructions from the U.S.; that their leaders — Artem Sytnyk and Nazar Kholodnytskyi, respectively — did not always get along well with each other; and their performance was poor compared to PGO investigations.

At one of the events, Sytnyk, according to Lutsenko, allegedly stated that he "wished that Hillary [Clinton] had won [the 2016 U.S. presidential election]". Yovanovitch, according to Lutsenko, spent money on the PR of the "ineffective" NABU and once stated that she would "make Sytnyk president".

Керівник САП Назар Холодницький (ліворуч) та директор НАБУ Артем Ситник на засіданні Ради, Київ, 4 квітня 2018 року

SAPO head Nazar Kholodnytskyi (left) and NABU director Artem Sytnyk at a parliamentary session, Kyiv, April 4, 2018
Photo: Viacheslav Ratynskyi / UNIAN

Among the documents released is a detailed chronology of Joe Biden's actions on Ukrainian foreign policy, as well as a copy of The Hill's articles, which include the previously mentioned interview with Lutsenko.

The documents published by the State Department also contain an email from John Herbst, the fifth U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, to David Gale, Deputy Secretary of State for Political Affairs. It contains an appeal dated April 5, signed by six former U.S. ambassadors to Ukraine, to defend Yovanovitch and remonstrate against Lutsenko's actions.

“The [Hill] articles show a lack of understanding of Ukrainian politics. [Journalist John] Solomon takes the words of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine at face value and describes him as a reformer. However, many observers in Ukraine and abroad consider his reform activity as a prosecutor general at best dubious,” the letter reads.

Gale sent the letter to at least two other State Department employees: Counselor Ulrich Brechbuhl and Acting Assistant Secretary of European and Eurasian Affairs, Philip Reeker. And also to a secret addressee with "Not sure what to do with this" written in the body of the letter.

READ MORE: Ukrainian PG on Burisma: “No Politicians Tried to Influence My Decisions"

Another letter of concern about the campaign against Yovanovitch was prepared on April 12 by Democratic Party congressmen Steny Hoyer and Eliot Engel and addressed Pompeo directly. However, Lutsenko’s name is not mentioned there. It was only on July 11 that the State Department responded saying Yovanovitch left office in accordance with the planned rotation.

/Original (Ukrainian) text by Maxim Kamenev and Oleh Pavliuk

Thanks to the support from our readers, Hromadske International has been existing for five years. We cover hot-button political topics, high-profile corruption, and human rights issues. We report from the Donbas and annexed Crimea. If you would like to support Hromadske International, you can donate on this page

Unlike many other media in Ukraine, we are not owned by oligarchs or politicians. Please help support independent journalism in Ukraine.